TanStack Router: Unauthenticated reflected XSS in TanStack Start server-function responses
GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8 · CVE-2026-102989
Published · Modified
AI SAST
Find this class of vulnerability in your own code
Corgea's AI-native static analysis detects vulnerabilities like this one across your repositories, ranks them by exploitability, and returns review-ready fixes.
Description
Impact
An unauthenticated attacker can craft a URL to a server function in an affected TanStack Start app. If someone opens the link, the app can return attacker-controlled HTML from its own origin and run the attacker's JavaScript there. The script can access same-origin data available to that visitor and make requests with their authority.
Cause
The server-function transport can pass request payload fields into internal middleware state instead of limiting them to public input fields. A malformed payload can leave an attacker-controlled result in the error path. Response handling can then treat a response-shaped object as an HTTP response.
Affected versions
Published versions of @tanstack/start-server-core, @tanstack/react-start, @tanstack/solid-start, and @tanstack/vue-start from 1.143.12 up to, but not including, their respective patched versions are affected. The patched versions are @tanstack/start-server-core@1.169.39, @tanstack/react-start@1.168.60, @tanstack/solid-start@1.168.57, and @tanstack/vue-start@1.168.56.
Fix
The fix limits client-supplied server-function input to public fields and validates responses at the server boundary. Upgrade to the corresponding patched package version.
Temporary mitigations
For the configured server-function path, usually /_serverFn/*, an edge or WAF rule can consider blocking requests without the literal x-tsr-serverFn: true header and browser document navigations such as Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate or Accept: text/html. A restrictive Content Security Policy on server-function responses can provide another browser-side restriction. These are mitigation suggestions, not a complete fix. The header is client-controlled and is not authentication. Test rules against legitimate GET and POST server functions and use a matching version-specific backport where possible.
Credits
Lovable helped us discover and report this issue. We thank them for their help.
References
- WEB https://github.com/TanStack/router/security/advisories/GHSA-qx66-fv34-fjm8
- ADVISORY https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-102989
- WEB https://github.com/TanStack/router/pull/8573
- WEB https://github.com/TanStack/router/commit/d521abd71c69f1ff010bb3def4d417cb5fa058cb
- PACKAGE https://github.com/TanStack/router
- WEB https://github.com/TanStack/router/releases/tag/release-2026-09-30-1747
Ready to move
Start Securing
Free, no credit card | First findings in minutes