Define an auth boundary for the internal issue APIs
New internal endpoints are reachable without any authentication mechanism described.
Security Design Review
Corgea reviews every design, ticket, and spec for security risk — grounded against your real codebase — so flaws are caught at the design stage instead of in production.
+0K scans every month - Trusted by thousands of devs
How it works
Corgea pulls in the designs, tickets, and docs your teams already write, reasons over them against your repository, and hands back prioritized, design-stage recommendations.
Design surfaces
Recommendations
New internal endpoints are reachable without any authentication mechanism described.
High-impact fields can be modified without role-based approval controls.
PII crosses a trust boundary into analytics without encryption in transit.
Ingested scan context is shown in templates and may enable stored XSS.
Why Corgea
Move from reactive vulnerability-chasing to proactive, design-led security — without slowing builders down.
Find broken auth, exposed data, and missing trust boundaries while they are still a proposal — before a single line of code is written.
Every recommendation is checked against how your codebase actually works — its frameworks, auth, and security patterns — not generic best practice.
Engineering never waits in a queue for security. Tickets and specs are reviewed automatically the moment they are written.
Stop sampling by risk because of headcount. Every design, ticket, and doc gets a consistent, high-quality review.
Connects to Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, Jira, and your source control so reviews happen where work already happens.
As coding agents accelerate how fast designs ship, Corgea scales security review to keep pace without becoming the bottleneck.
What it checks
Security Design Review checks for the risks a proposed design introduces or implies, then validates each one against the existing repo.
Every design, ticket, and spec is read for the risks a change introduces or implies.
Each finding is checked against how your codebase actually works today, not generic best practice.
Design-led security
See design-stage risk in your own tickets and specs in minutes.
A security design review evaluates a proposed feature, ticket, or spec for the security risks it introduces or implies — things like authentication and authorization flows, sensitive data flows, trust boundaries, and external integrations — before the work is built.
Like threat modeling, Corgea focuses on the design stage. But instead of requiring teams to hand-build diagrams, it reads the designs, tickets, and docs you already write and grounds every finding against your actual repository, so reviews happen automatically and at the speed of development.
Corgea reads your existing codebase to understand its frameworks, how authentication is implemented, which security middleware and patterns are in place, how sensitive data is handled, and what gaps are already known. Recommendations reflect your real system instead of generic advice.
Security Design Review ingests design context from sources like Confluence, Notion, Google Docs, Jira, GitHub, GitLab, Azure DevOps, Bitbucket, Harness, and Cursor, and surfaces recommendations where your teams already work.
Reviews complete in minutes rather than the days a manual design review can take, so security keeps pace with engineering instead of blocking releases.
No. It scales them. Corgea automates the repetitive review work so your security architects can focus on the highest-impact decisions while every change still gets a consistent review.
Ready to move
Free, no credit card | First findings in minutes